🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “total contradiction” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Correspondence acquired by reporters originating from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the country’s government ministers demands plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be scrapped or postponed.

The tobacco firm seeks amendments to a proposed legislation that include reductions in the proposed size of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the withdrawal of controls on flavored smoking items, and diminished punishments for any firms breaking the new laws.

Activist commentary

“If I was a politician, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” said the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Over seven thousand citizens a year pass away from cigarette-linked health conditions, according to global health agency statistics.

Chimbala said the letter was known to have been circulated to various ministerial offices and was in circulating through public interest organizations.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

The situation emerges alongside expanded apprehension about industry interference with medical guidelines. In recent weeks, global health authorities sounded an alarm that the smoking product companies was escalating campaigns to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“Evidence exists of corporate influence worldwide. Manufacturer hallmarks are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN international gathering,” said Jorge Alday.

Potential consequences

“If a tobacco control measure isn’t passed because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in individuals' health who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The tobacco control bill progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and mandating that visual health alerts cover 75% of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

Through correspondence, BAT suggests this be reduced to 30% or 50% “following international guideline limits”, deferred for no less than one year after the bill passes.

Global health authorities in fact recommends a alert needs to encompass at least fifty percent of the cigarette package face “and aim to cover as much of the principal display areas as possible”. In the UK, warnings must cover sixty-five percent of a product container sides.

Scented product controversy

The corporation requests the removal of broad restrictions on scented smoking items, claiming that it would drive users to “illicitly sold” products. The company proposes banning a limited selection of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation suggests penalties for multiple violations “varying from a percentage of annual turnover to ten-year jail sentences”.

Corporate defense

Through correspondence, the managing director of the African subsidiary claims the corporation is focused on good corporate behaviour” and “backs the goals of governments to lower tobacco use and the associated health impact” but maintains that “certain measures can have unwelcome and unexpected consequences.”

Campaigner rebuttal

The campaigner argued BAT’s proposed changes would “dilute these regulations so much that the necessary effect for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that numerous similar measures existed in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “total double standard”, he stated.

“We exist in a connected world. Should I grow cigarettes in my property and harvest that and distribute the goods – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my community's youth consumes … to profit individually and all the future family lines while my neighbour’s children are perishing … is in itself complete moral bankruptcy.”

Tobacco control legislation in the UK or elsewhere had not caused companies to close, Chimbala said. “Regulations don't close the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Standard business position

The company representative said: “BAT Zambia conducts its business in compliance with applicable local laws. Further, the corporation engages in the state's regulatory development in line with the suitable systems which allow for stakeholder participation in legislation creation.”

The firm positioned itself as “not resisting legislation”, the spokesperson stated, mentioning that underage people should be safeguarded against acquiring smoking products and nicotine.

“We support evolving legislation to realize planned community wellbeing objectives, while accepting the variety of privileges and responsibilities on industry, consumers and related stakeholders,” the representative explained, adding that BAT’s proposals “represent the situation of the African nation's economy and cigarette sector, which involves increasing amounts of illicit trade”.

Zambia’s department of economic activities and commercial operations was contacted for response.