🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. EOB. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who understands all this stuff? Certainly not the average business owner. Nor the typical worker. Selecting the right medical coverage for companies – or for households – appears to require demands a PhD in medical insurance.

Our Medical System Isn't Just Complex, It's Costly

According to a recent study, typical households pays $twenty-seven thousand each year on medical coverage (increasing by 6% from last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is projected to exceed $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Now federal operations is shut down because partisan disputes over tax credits which analysts predict will lead to premium increases up to 100% for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

When will we seriously consider a national health insurance program in the United States? I have to believe we're getting closer since this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare program – an established insurance framework – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure doesn't change. The way our healthcare providers receive payment changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

The Way Universal Coverage Would Work

Universal healthcare coverage would require contributions from both employees and employers. In similar programs, a worker making moderate income pays about five point three percent to their healthcare. The company must contribute approximately 13.75%.

Does this seem expensive? Unless you compare it to what average American pays. I can name dozens of businesses who are easily contributing between 8% to 15% of payroll costs for medical benefits. And keep in mind that in inclusive programs, these contributions also cover retirement benefits, sick pay, maternity leave and unemployment benefits in addition to funding medical services. When you add these expenses compared with our current spending on retirement programs, unemployment insurance and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Execution for America

In the US, a national health premium would increase our Medicare tax deduction, a framework already established. It should be means-based – those at higher income levels would pay more than lower-income earners. This includes both an employee and company payments. Similar to much of our government's defense, technology, welfare services and infrastructure, the system could be managed to third-party administrators rather than federal agencies.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program would be a significant advantage for entrepreneurs like mine. It would put us on a level playing field against big corporations who can afford superior coverage. It would make administration significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding remitted like social security and healthcare taxes, rather than individual transactions to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would enable simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, instead of enduring the complex (and fruitless) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers required annually every year. Due to simplification, there would be a better understanding about benefits by our employees – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to decipher the complexities of current options. And there would definitely exist less liability for employers as we no longer have access to our employees' medical records for weighing risks and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as they get. However I recognize that government play important functions in society, including national security to supporting essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, easier system for small businesses that employ the majority of American employees and generate half the economic output. It enables employees to be healthier, come to work more often and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Exist numerous factors I'm not addressing? Certainly. Given rising medical expenses we've seen in recent years, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. I understand that we're not a small, Scandinavian country where big changes are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, even with increased taxation required, would still be a superior and more affordable approach both for controlling healthcare costs and ensuring coverage to everyone.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, we need to tone down national pride. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank significantly behind many other countries in healthcare quality globally, based on major studies. Perhaps a bright spot amid present circumstances is that we undertake a hard look at ourselves and acknowledge that major reforms need to happen.