🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to reinitiate atomic talks with Washington on condition that it is approached with "respect" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has stated.

The Iranian diplomat stated solely negotiations worked, and shared new appeals had been made by intermediaries to reopen negotiations with the Trump administration. He claimed Iran did not have secret atomic facilities, and Tehran was not yet able to authorize the UN nuclear inspectorate to inspect bombed nuclear sites for protective measures.

Navigating a Difficult Course

The foreign minister is navigating a challenging route since Iran aims to avoid be perceived to be proceeding from a situation of disadvantage, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had arisen stronger in military terms and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was addressing at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material on home soil that it will perpetually retain" – the key factor of the impasse in the earlier negotiations.

Prior Talks Unexpectedly Ended

The previous five rounds of negotiations between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and acrimonious termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a 12-day war that culminated with Donald Trump asserting the locations had been eliminated. Following this, European countries used their right to reinstate international penalties, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.

Magic Solution Offered

Iranian officials claimed they felt they had achieved a "ideal resolution" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was decided an Iran-based consortium with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. Both sides would have been able to claim victory since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be confident that Iran's atomic project was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been decided in the discussions that Washington's technical specialists could function inside Iran, but that was a logical implication of the consortium proposal. Representatives claimed on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with Washington's diplomat the US official only for the arrangement to collapse due to "detractors in America".

Present Status

Iran's diplomats said the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the suggestion could be resurrected in various formats if negotiations reopen.

Trump in recent days stated he had been getting signals that Iran desired to reopen negotiations, but confidentially Iran's diplomats state they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from Washington either directly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Iranian foreign ministry has been criticized of non-responsiveness in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran states negotiations is not part of a spectacle.

Diplomatic Standpoint

In his speech to the conference, designed to paint the US as a dominant force that misuses the idea of international law, the foreign minister declared the two-week conflict showed the dispute could not be resolved by combat operations. He said the strikes commenced with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and concluded with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were executed with full US knowledge and coordination, making trust hard to rebuild.

Diplomacy Stays the Ultimate Answer

Araghchi said: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted negotiations; it was America and the western countries that had repeatedly attempted to dictate their demands during the discussions. Negotiations can still be viable and stays the primary resolution to resolve disagreements, but its criteria, rules and principles must be followed."

"If they speak to the nation of Iran with the tone of respect and honor, they will receive a response in the same language."

Restoration and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Tehran representatives as the conflict of restoration and rebuilding, Araghchi said he was certain Iran's defence capabilities "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been rebuilt. We gained many lessons from this conflict; we have come to know our own weaknesses and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He continued: "We successfully passed this war. Our nuclear technology, which they planned to eliminate, stays intact. The sites and machinery, if eliminated, will be restored; what is crucial is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they sought to undermine, but failed to shatter. The citizens of Tehran have grown stronger, more united, and more backing of the government and the state in the face of this attack."